Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force, getting a general score of 76.4 against 75.8. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Motorola Droid Turbo has older 4.4.4 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Motorola Droid Turbo's design is older, much thicker and just a little bit heavier than the Moto Z Force.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto Z Force, because although it has 1 GB less RAM, and they both have 4 cores, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an additional GPU. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a better looking display than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a bit higher count of pixels in each display inch.
Moto Z Force has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto Z Force takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a better 21 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, better video frame rates and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low-light situations.
Motorola Droid Turbo not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.