Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black and Blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is a little bit better than the Moto Z Force, getting a 77.9 score against 75.8. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola DROID Turbo has an older 4.4.4 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Despite being the best we compare here, we must highlight that it's also older, a lot thicker and just a little bit heavier.
Motorola DROID Turbo features just a bit better processing power than Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Quad-Core processor, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an extra GPU. Motorola DROID Turbo features a more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 2560 x 1440, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Moto Z Force has a little bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Moto Z Force also has a larger diafragm aperture, a more mega-pixels camera in the back and better 30 fps video frame rates.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Motorola DROID Turbo is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.