Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force, having a score of 79.7 against 75.8. The Moto G Stylus design is a lot newer, but somewhat heavier and way thicker than Motorola Moto Z Force. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Moto G Stylus has the previous 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The Moto G Stylus has a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Moto G Stylus also has 4 more cores. The Motorola Moto Z Force features a little more vivid display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Motorola Moto Z Force has a bit bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Moto G Stylus features a bit superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Moto G Stylus has a superior camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G Stylus also has a bigger aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited environments and a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Motorola Moto G Stylus is more expensive than Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.