Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-12-21 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A12 has a global score of 80.3, which is a bit better than Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A12 has the previous 10 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Samsung Galaxy A12's body is extremely newer, but a lot heavier and thicker than the Moto Z Force.
Moto Z Force counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A12, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a lot higher screen density. The Moto Z Force counts with a better memory for games and applications than Galaxy A12, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto Z Force also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A12 has a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy A12 also has a greater number of faster cores. Galaxy A12 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A12 takes slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A12 also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.