Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 534 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is much better than the Moto Z Force's overall score of 75.8. The Galaxy A32 construction is incredibly newer, but way thicker and heavier than the Moto Z Force. Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat OS.
The Moto Z Force features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way greater pixel count per display inch and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Moto Z Force features more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A32, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto Z Force also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A32 has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy A32 also has a larger number of cores. The Galaxy A32 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also has a way more MP camera.
The Galaxy A32 has a really longer battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.