Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A60 is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force, with a overall score of 82.3 against 75.8. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A60 has the older 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. The Galaxy A60 body is a lot newer than Moto Z Force's, although it's just a little heavier and a little thicker.
Moto Z Force features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better pixel amount in each inch of screen. The Moto Z Force counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A60 features a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4 more processing cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto Z Force takes clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light images, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video definition, the Motorola Moto Z Force also counts with a way better resolution back-facing camera.
The Motorola Moto Z Force has a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has a 3% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.