Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is much better than Moto Z Force, getting a 91.8 score against 75.8. Galaxy A71 5G's design is incredibly newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than the Moto Z Force. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version while Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a little sharper display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy A71 5G has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a greater camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same camera aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a much more megapixels back facing camera. The Galaxy A71 5G features slightly more storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has improved battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Galaxy A71 5G costs a lot more than Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.