Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is much better than the Moto Z Force's score of 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy A80 design is much newer than the Moto Z Force's, but it's way thicker and incredibly heavier. Motorola Moto Z Force has a slightly better display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and more pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy A80 features a bit better processing unit than Moto Z Force, because it has a higher number of 2200 megahertz cores and 4 GB more RAM. Galaxy A80 captures a bit better videos and photos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photos and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy A80 also counts with a lot more MP camera.
The Moto Z Force counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A80 features a bit longer battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 6% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.