Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is better than Moto Z Force's 75.8 general score. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android OS, while Moto Z Force comes with Android 7.0 Nougat OS. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a extremely newer cellphone than the Moto Z Force, although it is incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Moto Z Force has a little bit better screen than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater count of pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The Galaxy A90 5G takes much better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting photos or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has a 29 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.