Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-09-01 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy C9 Pro has an older 6.0 Marshmallow version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Although the Galaxy C9 Pro and Motorola Moto Z Force were only released with a couple months difference, Galaxy C9 Pro's body is somewhat heavier but a little thinner than Motorola Moto Z Force.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and more cores (although slower). Moto Z Force has a more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better number of pixels per screen inch.
The Moto Z Force counts with much more storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto Z Force also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a little better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
The Moto Z Force takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos in low light situations, a back facing camera with a much better 21 mega-pixels resolution and a lot better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.