Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30s is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, getting a overall score of 83.3 against 75.8. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy M30s has an older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Galaxy M30s's construction is newer, but heavier and thicker than the Motorola Moto Z Force.
The Motorola Moto Z Force features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater pixel number per inch in the screen. Motorola Moto Z Force features a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also has a greater number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy M30s has a way better battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy M30s captures better videos and photos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy M30s also counts with a much better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.