Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.1 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is slightly better than Moto Z Force, with a 79.3 score against 75.8. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has the previous 5.1 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is an older cellphone than the Moto Z Force, but it's a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a little sharper screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Moto Z Force counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Moto Z Force also has 3 more processing cores.
The Moto Z Force and the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ both count with really similar cameras, although the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a lower video quality, a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing images or video in low light environments and a back-facing camera with way less MP resolution.
Moto Z Force has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto Z Force also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z Force has a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z Force. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto Z Force, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.