Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ3 has a general score of 79.6, which is a little bit better than Moto Z Force's score of 75.8. Xperia XZ3's design is much newer, but heavier and much thicker than Moto Z Force. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS, but Xperia XZ3 has 9.0 Pie version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Sony Xperia XZ3 counts with a little more vivid screen than Moto Z Force, because it has a bit higher 1440 x 2880px resolution, a little bit greater pixel amount per inch in the screen and a little bigger display. The Xperia XZ3 has a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Xperia XZ3 also has a larger number of cores.
The Moto Z Force features much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ3, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z Force also has an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a bit superior battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has a 5 percent larger battery size.
Xperia XZ3 has a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a less MP camera in the back and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and video in low light situations.
Although Xperia XZ3 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto Z Force. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Moto Z Force, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.