Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-01 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has a score of 78.8, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto Z Force's general score of 75.8. The vivo X60 Pro construction is much newer, but a bit heavier and a bit thicker than Motorola Moto Z Force. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the vivo X60 Pro has an older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Moto Z Force has a little bit better looking screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. The Moto Z Force has a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Vivo X60 Pro features a faster CPU than Moto Z Force, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cores. The vivo X60 Pro has greater battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. Vivo X60 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has a lot better resolution back-facing camera and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.