Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-09-01 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a global score of 85.5, which is much better than the Moto Z Force's 75.8 overall score. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction is newer than the Moto Z Force's, but it is a bit heavier and somewhat thicker. Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows 1,7 TB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a larger number of cores and 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a slightly better camera than Moto Z Force, although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower resolution, a smaller aperture and a lower video definition. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little better battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 14 percent more battery size.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z Force, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.