Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2016-09-08 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max is much better than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, with a general score of 84.5 against 71.8. Even though the Apple iPhone XS Max is noticeably newer than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, it is just a little bit thicker and way heavier. Apple iPhone XS Max features a superior CPU than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU and more RAM memory.
The iPhone XS Max has a much better looking display than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a better resolution of 1242 x 2688px, a little greater pixel density and a larger screen. The Moto Z Play Droid has a much bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone XS Max, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Moto Z Play Droid features a bit better battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 3510mAh battery size. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a back camera with a much worse 12 MP resolution and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light images and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.