Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2016-09-08 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is better than the Moto Z Play Droid's 71.8 score. The Google Pixel 2 design is newer and lighter than the Moto Z Play Droid's, although it's also just a little thicker. The Google Pixel 2 has a bit faster CPU than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 2 also has more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a little bit better looking display than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 1920, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a just a little better quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Google Pixel 2 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way less megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
The Moto Z Play Droid counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Moto Z Play Droid counts with longer battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 30% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.