Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a lot better than the Moto Z Play Droid, having a 91.8 score against 71.8. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a noticeably newer device than the Moto Z Play Droid, but it is somewhat thicker and heavier. The Galaxy A71 5G features a little more vivid screen than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a quite worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a larger display.
The Galaxy A71 5G has just a little better processing power than Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and video and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy A71 5G features greater battery duration than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a 28 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.