Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-09-08 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black and Gold |
| Glass and Metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is better than the Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, having a score of 81 against 71.8. The Galaxy C9 Pro body is somewhat heavier but a bit thinner than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, and both of them were only released 6 months apart. The Galaxy C9 Pro has a processor that's very similar to Moto Z Play Droid's CPU, and although the Galaxy C9 Pro has more RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Moto Z Play Droid counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, the Moto Z Play Droid also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch. The Moto Z Play Droid takes clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking images or videos in low light environments, and they both have a camera in the back with a 16 megapixels, the Moto Z Play Droid also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition.
The Moto Z Play Droid features more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a little longer battery performance than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.