| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2014-09-03 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.96 x 3.24 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 525 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 3 | 7.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 18 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Galaxy Note Edge is much better than Moto Z Play Droid, getting a global score of 81.7 against 71.8. Even though the Galaxy Note Edge is better than Moto Z Play Droid, it must be noted that it is also much older, thicker and a bit heavier. Galaxy Note Edge counts with a bit better processor than Moto Z Play Droid, because although it has 4 lesser CPU cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy Note Edge also counts with a graphics processing unit.
The Galaxy Note Edge counts with an incredibly better looking display than Moto Z Play Droid, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher count of pixels per inch of screen. The Moto Z Play Droid has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note Edge, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto Z Play Droid also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Note Edge shoots slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z Play Droid, although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and video in low light environments, they both have the same video resolution, a same resolution camera in the back and the same video frame rate.
The Moto Z Play Droid counts with a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy Note Edge, because it has 3510mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.