Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-10-04 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 is much better than the Motorola Moto Z Play, with an 83.3 score against 74.4. Apple iPhone 11's design is a lot newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than Motorola Moto Z Play. The Apple iPhone 11 counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Motorola Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The Apple iPhone 11 has a better performing processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with 1 GB more RAM and a 64-bits processing unit. Apple iPhone 11 counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a little inferior count of pixels per inch of display and a bit worse resolution of 828 x 1792, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
The Moto Z Play has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 11, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. IPhone 11 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Moto Z Play, because although it has a much less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Motorola Moto Z Play has a bit superior battery life than iPhone 11, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity.
Although iPhone 11 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto Z Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto Z Play. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto Z Play, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.