Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-10-04 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro Max is much better than Moto Z Play, having an 85.3 score against 74.4. The iPhone 11 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS, and Moto Z Play counts with Android 8.0 Oreo OS. Even though the iPhone 11 Pro Max is much newer than Moto Z Play, it's thicker and heavier. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a quite better processing power than Moto Z Play, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with 1 GB more RAM and a 64-bits processing unit.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max features a more vivid screen than Moto Z Play, because it has a larger display, a better resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels and a little higher display density. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a back camera with way less MP and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos.
Motorola Moto Z Play has a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a bit superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto Z Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z Play. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto Z Play, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.