Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2016-10-04 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro is a lot better than the Motorola Moto Z Play, getting a global score of 92.8 against 74.4. IPhone 12 Pro's body is noticeably newer than the Motorola Moto Z Play's, but it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. IPhone 12 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, and Motorola Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
The iPhone 12 Pro features a more vivid screen than Moto Z Play, because it has a little more pixels per inch of screen, a higher 1170 x 2532 resolution and a little bit bigger screen. The Motorola Moto Z Play features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
IPhone 12 Pro has a greater hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a 64-bits CPU. The Moto Z Play has superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 3510mAh battery size against 2815mAh.
IPhone 12 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a much less mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z Play, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.