Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2016-10-04 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto Z Play's 74.4 general score. The iPhone 12 Pro Max design is newer than Motorola Moto Z Play's, but it's notably heavier and a little thicker. The iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Motorola Moto Z Play counts with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a better performing processor than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64-bits processing unit. Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max features a much better looking screen than Moto Z Play, because it has a better resolution of 1284 x 2778 pixels, a bigger screen and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Moto Z Play counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has a bit better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has 3687mAh of battery capacity against 3510mAh.
IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a slightly better camera than Moto Z Play, because although it has a lower video resolution and a way less megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
Although iPhone 12 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z Play. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone 12 Pro Max, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z Play, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.