Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x |
| 2016-10-04 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro is way better than the Moto Z Play, with a global score of 93.3 against 74.4. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo operating system. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro construction is notably newer than Moto Z Play's, although it's a bit thicker and heavier.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has less cpu cores (but faster), it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a 64-bits processing unit. The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a little bit higher pixels density, a quite larger screen and a better 1170 x 2532 resolution.
The Moto Z Play counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z Play has just a bit longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 3510mAh of battery capacity.
The iPhone 13 Pro shoots clearer photographs and videos than Moto Z Play, because although it has a lot less MP resolution camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a much bigger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low light situations.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto Z Play, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.