Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-04 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X has a general score of 88.1, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z Play's 74.4 score. The Apple iPhone X construction is newer than Motorola Moto Z Play's, but it's just a bit heavier and a little thicker. IPhone X counts with a superior processor than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has less cores (although faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM, the iPhone X also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone X has a more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a quite bigger display, a slightly higher 1125 x 2436 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The iPhone X takes slightly better pictures and videos than Moto Z Play, because although it has a way worse 12 megapixels resolution camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low light captures and videos.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a little bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z Play, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Moto Z Play has longer battery duration than Apple iPhone X, because it has 3510mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Although iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z Play, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z Play. If you want to save some money, you can buy Moto Z Play, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.