Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-04 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is much better than the Moto Z Play, with an 82 score against 74.4. Even though iPhone XR is much newer than Moto Z Play, it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. The iPhone XR counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto Z Play, because although it has a bit worse 828 x 1792 pixels resolution and a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
Motorola Moto Z Play features a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. IPhone XR features a quite better hardware performance than Moto Z Play, because although it has less processing cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the iPhone XR also counts with a 64 bits processor.
IPhone XR takes just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a lot worse 12 MP resolution camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments. The Motorola Moto Z Play has a bit longer battery lifetime than iPhone XR, because it has a 19 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto Z Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto Z Play. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Moto Z Play, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.