Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2020-07-23 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black glare |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has a general score of 87.4, which is much better than Motorola Moto Z Play's global score of 74.4. Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition's body is much newer than Motorola Moto Z Play's, but it is noticeably thicker and notably heavier. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has the previous 10 version and Motorola Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition counts with a much better looking screen than Moto Z Play, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition counts with a bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Moto Z Play, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition has a little bit better performance than Moto Z Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition also has a larger amount of RAM. Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition counts with a really longer battery performance than Moto Z Play, because it has a 71% bigger battery capacity.
Asus ROG Phone 3 Strix Edition features a lot better camera than Moto Z Play, because it has a bigger aperture, a way more MP back-facing camera and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.