Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2020-09-01 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.50 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 8.11 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Aurora black and Pastel white |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ZenFone 7 Pro is much better than the Moto Z Play, with an 88.3 score against 74.4. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Asus ZenFone 7 Pro has 11 version while Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though the Asus ZenFone 7 Pro is notably newer than Moto Z Play, it is incredibly thicker and much heavier.
Asus ZenFone 7 Pro features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a bit lower pixel number in each screen inch, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger screen. Asus ZenFone 7 Pro features a much better storage for apps and games than Moto Z Play, and although they both have an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB, the Asus ZenFone 7 Pro also has 256 GB internal memory.
The Asus ZenFone 7 Pro has a little better performance than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Asus ZenFone 7 Pro also has more RAM memory. The Asus ZenFone 7 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a much more MP back facing camera, a bigger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations and a way higher video quality.
Asus ZenFone 7 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Moto Z Play, because it has a 42 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.