Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-10-04 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z Play, getting a score of 77 against 74.4. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the LG G7 Fit has a newer 8.1 Oreo version while Motorola Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo, giving a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations. Even though LG G7 Fit is just a little bit thicker than the Motorola Moto Z Play, it's just a little lighter and extremely newer.
The LG G7 Fit has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a greater quantity of pixels per display inch, a quite bigger display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120. Moto Z Play features a little bit better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
The LG G7 Fit has a little bit better camera than Moto Z Play, although it has a smaller aperture, they both have the same video frame rate, a back facing camera with a 16 megapixels resolution and the same 3840x2160 video definition. LG G7 Fit and Moto Z Play count with really similar memory to install games and applications, both have the same internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola Moto Z Play counts with a bit superior battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 17% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.