Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Titan gray |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has a general score of 85.4, which is better than Motorola Moto Z Play's general score of 74.4. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG K92 has the previous 10 version and Motorola Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though the LG K92 is newer than the Motorola Moto Z Play, it is thicker and heavier.
LG K92 features a display that is very similar to Moto Z Play's screen, because although the LG K92 has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger screen. LG K92 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG K92 also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG K92 counts with a way better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the LG K92 also has a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture. The LG K92 has a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG K92 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
LG K92 counts with a bit better battery life than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3510mAh.
LG K92 costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z Play, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.