Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-04 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z Play, with an 81.3 score against 74.4. Even though LG V35 ThinQ is a bit thicker than Motorola Moto Z Play, it's just a bit lighter and newer. LG V35 ThinQ counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better looking screen than Moto Z Play, because it has a little bit bigger display, a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater count of pixels per screen inch. The LG V35 ThinQ features a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto Z Play, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG V35 ThinQ also has more internal storage.
Moto Z Play has a bit superior battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 3510mAh of battery capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a 16 mega pixels back facing camera and the same video quality, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a larger aperture.
The LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Motorola Moto Z Play, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.