Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Blue and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is much better than the Moto Z Play, having a global score of 87.6 against 74.4. The LG V60 ThinQ construction is noticeably newer than Moto Z Play's, although it is extremely heavier and thicker. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but LG V60 ThinQ has an older 11 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The LG V60 ThinQ features just a bit better display than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a little bit lower pixels number in each inch in the display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2460px resolution and a larger display. The LG V60 ThinQ features a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Moto Z Play, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light environments, a camera in the back with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution and a lot better video quality. LG V60 ThinQ has a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z Play, and although they both have an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more internal storage.
LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior battery performance than Moto Z Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3510mAh.
LG V60 ThinQ costs more than Motorola Moto Z Play, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.