Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-10-04 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than Moto Z Play's 74.4 score. The LG Velvet design is notably newer than the Moto Z Play's, but it is just a bit heavier and just a little thicker. The LG Velvet features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto Z Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Velvet also has more RAM memory.
LG Velvet features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a little worse display pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels. The LG Velvet has a much better camera than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG Velvet also has a bigger camera aperture and a way more mega-pixels camera.
The LG Velvet counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG Velvet also has 96 GB more internal storage. LG Velvet has better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a 4300mAh battery size instead of 3510mAh.
The LG Velvet not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the Moto Z Play.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.