Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is much better than Motorola Moto Z Play, with a score of 91.2 against 74.4. These phones work with Android OS, but the LG Wing has the previous 10 version while Motorola Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version. LG Wing is a extremely newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z Play, although it is extremely heavier and way thicker.
LG Wing counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG Wing also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG Wing counts with just a bit better display than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a just a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution.
LG Wing features a much better camera than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same video definition, the LG Wing also has higher video frame rates, a bigger camera aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels. LG Wing has much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z Play, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has more internal storage.
The LG Wing counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto Z Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto Z Play. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy LG Wing, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z Play, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.