Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Interstellar Black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a general score of 83.4, which is better than the Motorola Moto Z Play's general score of 74.4. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has older 13 version and Motorola Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro body is a lot newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than Motorola Moto Z Play.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit sharper display than Moto Z Play, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixels quantity per inch of display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a larger display. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Moto Z Play, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto Z Play counts with an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has superior battery lifetime than Moto Z Play, because it has a 4600mAh battery size against 3510mAh. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much better camera than Moto Z Play, because it has a larger aperture, a way better resolution back camera and a way better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.