Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an overall score of 86.3, which is much better than the Moto Z Play's 74.4 score. These devices use Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has older 14 version while Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro design is incredibly newer than the Moto Z Play's, but it is somewhat thicker and heavier.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a sharper display than Moto Z Play, because although it has a just a little worse display pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Moto Z Play, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Moto Z Play features a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a lot bigger aperture and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features superior battery life than Moto Z Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.