Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a general score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z Play's 74.4 general score. The Motorola One Hyper is a notably newer phone than the Motorola Moto Z Play, although it's somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola One Hyper has an older 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Motorola Moto Z Play and Motorola One Hyper count with very similar processing units, and although the Motorola One Hyper has more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola One Hyper has a screen that's very similar to the Motorola Moto Z Play one, because although the Motorola One Hyper has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bigger display.
Motorola One Hyper has a much better camera than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos and a back facing camera with much more MP.
The Motorola One Hyper has a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola One Hyper has just a bit better battery life than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola One Hyper costs more than the Moto Z Play, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.