Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 has a global score of 80.8, which is a bit better than the Moto Z Play's global score of 74.4. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Nokia XR20 has 11 version while Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Nokia XR20 is a a lot newer phone than Moto Z Play, although it's way heavier and thicker.
Nokia XR20 counts with a slightly better screen than Moto Z Play, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The Nokia XR20 has a greater storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has an external memory slot that admits 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory.
Nokia XR20 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Nokia XR20 also has more RAM memory. The Nokia XR20 features a better camera than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same video quality, the Nokia XR20 also has a larger aperture, faster video frame rates and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Nokia XR20 features longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a 4630mAh battery size instead of 3510mAh.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto Z Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto Z Play. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Motorola Moto Z Play, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.