Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Oppo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Ocean |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 has an overall score of 79.7, which is a little bit better than Moto Z Play's global score of 74.4. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but the OPPO Find X2 has the previous 10 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though OPPO Find X2 is extremely newer than the Moto Z Play, it's somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker.
OPPO Find X2 has a more vivid display than Moto Z Play, because it has a greater number of pixels per inch in the screen, a lot better 1440 x 3168 resolution and a larger screen. The OPPO Find X2 counts with a bit bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z Play, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 has a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. OPPO Find X2 features superior battery lifetime than Moto Z Play, because it has a 4200mAh battery size instead of 3510mAh.
The OPPO Find X2 has a much better camera than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 also has faster video frame rate, a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.