Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-04 | 2019-10-05 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 401 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A20s has a score of 77, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto Z Play's score of 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy A20s body is extremely newer, but a little bit thicker and a little heavier than Motorola Moto Z Play. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A20s has 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Moto Z Play counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A20s, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Moto Z Play features a brighter display than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much greater amount of pixels per display inch and a better 1080 x 1920 resolution.
Moto Z Play features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A20s, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting photographs or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back camera with more MP. The Motorola Moto Z Play features a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A20s features just a bit better battery life than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.