Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is much better than the Moto Z Play, having a general score of 84.6 against 74.4. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has an older 11 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's construction is extremely newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than the Moto Z Play.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with just a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a bit better screen than Moto Z Play, because although it has a quite worse pixel amount per display inch, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger display.
The Galaxy A22 5G features a little bit better camera than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low light environments and a way better resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a little bit better storage for games and applications than Moto Z Play, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 32 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A22 5G has a much longer battery performance than Moto Z Play, because it has a 42% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.