Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G is a bit better than Moto Z Play, getting a general score of 79.9 against 74.4. Galaxy A25 5G's design is extremely newer, but somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker than the Moto Z Play. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A25 5G has the older 14 version while Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bigger screen. Galaxy A25 5G features a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
The Moto Z Play counts with a much better processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a much better camera than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a bigger aperture and a way more MP back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a way better battery life than Moto Z Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.