Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2021-02-25 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Blue and Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Mediatek Helio G80 MT6769T chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only is much better than Moto Z Play, with an 82 score against 74.4. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A32 LTE Only has 11 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy A32 LTE Only's design is notably newer and notably lighter than Moto Z Play's, but it's also thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only's processor is just as good as the Moto Z Play one, and although the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A32 LTE Only counts with just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a just a bit higher pixel density and a larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a superior camera than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A32 LTE Only also has a larger aperture for better low-light photography and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A32 LTE Only features a little bit better storage capacity for applications and games than Moto Z Play, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A32 LTE Only has a very superior battery duration than Moto Z Play, because it has a 42 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.