Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2022-04-22 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A33 5G is slightly better than Moto Z Play, getting a global score of 77.8 against 74.4. Galaxy A33 5G's design is a lot newer than Moto Z Play's, although it's somewhat thicker and heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy A33 5G has the previous 12 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Moto Z Play has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, although it has a little smaller display, a just a little inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A33 5G counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory.
Moto Z Play counts with a much better performing processor than Galaxy A33 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Moto Z Play captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A33 5G, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures and videos in low light environments and a back-facing camera with lot less MP.
Galaxy A33 5G has a much better battery duration than Moto Z Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.