Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A41 is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z Play, with a global score of 81.7 against 74.4. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A41 has the previous 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy A41 construction is much newer and a little bit lighter than Motorola Moto Z Play's, but it is a little bit thicker.
Galaxy A41 counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a quite bigger display. The Motorola Moto Z Play counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A41, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A41 and Moto Z Play have very similar processors, and although the Galaxy A41 has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy A41 captures much better photographs and videos than Moto Z Play, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A41 also has a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Galaxy A41 has a battery life that's just as good as the Moto Z Play one, although the Galaxy A41 has a 0% smaller battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.