Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-04 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50s is much better than the Moto Z Play, having a global score of 86.6 against 74.4. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo. Samsung Galaxy A50s is a newer cellphone than the Moto Z Play, although it is a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker.
Galaxy A50s counts with a little bit better screen than Moto Z Play, because it has a just a bit greater count of pixels per inch in the display, a larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a bit superior CPU than Moto Z Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a better camera than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same video frame rates and the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a back camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution. Galaxy A50s features more storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto Z Play, because although it has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a little longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.