Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a lot better than the Moto Z Play, getting a 91.1 score against 74.4. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52s has 11 version while Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy A52s's design is a lot newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the Moto Z Play.
The Galaxy A52s features a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A52s also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52s features a little sharper display than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has a bigger display, a little bit more pixels per screen inch and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A52s features a way better camera than Moto Z Play, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52s also has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments.
Galaxy A52s features a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Moto Z Play, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A52s features longer battery performance than Moto Z Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3510mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.