Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-10-04 | 2016-06-01 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Glass and Metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C7 is a little bit better than Moto Z Play, with a score of 77.7 against 74.4. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 8.0 Oreo operating system. The Galaxy C7 body is just a little bit heavier but just a bit thinner than the Moto Z Play, and both of them were released only a couple of months apart.
Moto Z Play has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy C7, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, the Moto Z Play also counts with a just a little greater screen density. The Motorola Moto Z Play counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy C7 features a processing unit that is just as good as Moto Z Play's processing unit, and although the Galaxy C7 has 1 GB more RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Moto Z Play features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the Moto Z Play also counts with a way better video quality.
The Motorola Moto Z Play counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy C7, because it has a 3510mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.