Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2016-10-04 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.28 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold, Gray and White | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.68 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3510mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F23 is better than the Moto Z Play, getting a global score of 84.6 against 74.4. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy F23 has the previous 12 version while Moto Z Play has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Galaxy F23 design is newer and a lot lighter, but somewhat thicker than Moto Z Play.
Samsung Galaxy F23 features a bit sharper display than Moto Z Play, because although it has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2408px and a larger display. Moto Z Play counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy F23, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy F23 also has a larger amount of RAM. Moto Z Play has a slightly better camera than Galaxy F23, although it has a back-facing camera with lot less megapixels resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photography and videos.
Galaxy F23 features a much better battery life than Motorola Moto Z Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.